Noninvasive Positive-Pressure Ventilation: A Silver Bullet for Extubation Failure?
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Noninvasive Positive-Pressure Ventilation: A Silver Bullet for Extubation Failure?Extubation failure, or the need for reintubation within 24 -72 hours of extubation, occurs in up to 25% of critically ill patients.Extubation failure is associated with a markedly increased morbidity and mortality, including duration of mechanical ventilation, intensive care unit (ICU) and hospital stay, the need for post-acute-care hospitalization, and the need for tracheostomy. 1,2The most common cause of extubation failure is respiratory failure secondary to respiratory, cardiac, or neuromuscular disease.In this case, it seems plausible to consider the use of noninvasive positive-pressure ventilation (NPPV), given the extensive evidence that supports the use of NPPV to prevent intubation.The use of NPPV in the post-extubation period might be considered in 3 different clinical scenarios: (1) to allow earlier extubation, (2) to prevent extubation failure, and (3) to prevent reintubation in the setting of extubation failure.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".