MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2407695468

BK virus associated nephropathy in renal transplantation: where do we stand.

2011· article· en· W2407695468 on OpenAlexaff
Ankur Gupta, Prem Gupta

Bibliographic record

VenuePubMed · 2011
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicPolyomavirus and related diseases
Canadian institutionsOttawa Hospital
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMedicineBK virusImmunosuppressionContext (archaeology)NephropathyVirusIntensive care medicineEpidemiologyImmunologyClinical trialTransplantationKidney transplantationVirologyInternal medicine
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

BK virus is an increasingly identified complication in renal allograft recipients. During the last decade, the use of potent immunosuppressive medications has led to reemergence of this virus. Despite the paucity of randomized trials, we have come a long way in the knowledge of BK virus associated nephropathy. This review highlights the epidemiological, pathogenic, pathological, and clinical aspects of BK virus. It summarizes advances made in prophylaxis and treatment strategies to curtail this virus in an era of modern immunosuppression. The old word of wisdom- prevention is better than cure- might be relevant in context of BK virus prophylaxis with flouroquinolones in years to follow.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.635
Threshold uncertainty score0.401

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.030
GPT teacher head0.226
Teacher spread0.197 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations3
Published2011
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venuePubMedSame topicPolyomavirus and related diseasesFrench-language works237,207