[The elder of national medical publications (on the 180th anniversary of the Journal of Military Medicine (Voenno-Meditsinskiĭ Zhurnal))].
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The article is devoted to the history of creation of the medical periodical press in our country at the end of XVIII--first quarter of the XIX century. Contribution made by the director of Medical Department of Military Ministry Ya.V. Villie (1768-1854) into foundation of "Military Medical Journal", the 1st issue of which appeared in January 1823, is described. In July 1822 Ya.V. Villie presented the report to the Emperor Alexander the First where he explained the necessity of the journal for military doctors and pharmacists. The proposal of journal publication was confirmed by the Emperor in July 24 (August 5) 1823. This date is considered to be the day of "Military Medical Journal" foundation. In December 2002 the publication of articles of the volume 323 will be completed and in January 2003 the pages of volume 324 will be printed. During 180 years "Military Medical Journal" introduced the new scientific ideas into the life. It always remains the reliable assistant and adviser for army and navy medical workers in their professional activities.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.002 | 0.008 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.005 | 0.006 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.002 | 0.002 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.007 | 0.005 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Research integrity | 0.002 | 0.003 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.046 | 0.034 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".