Occupational safety and health in small animal veterinary practice: Part II — Parasitc zoonotic diseases
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The risk of exposure to zoonotic agents is inherent in the practice of veterinary medicine. While comprising only a small percentage of those with reported occupational injuries or diseases (1), veterinary practitioners should remain diligent to protect their own health and that of their staff. A number of parasites are recognized causes of zoonotic disease. This paper provides a brief description of some of the relevant parasitic zoonoses encountered by veterinarians in small animal practice. Relevant nonparasitic zoonoses were covered in a recent companion paper (Can Vet J 2002; 43:631–636). Not all possible zoonotic parasitic diseases or those that are mainly a concern for immunocompromised individuals are discussed; rather, this report concentrates on diseases that are most relevant to veterinary practitioners in Canada.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.002 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it