MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W2407868082

Clinical Vistas: Meniscus

2002· article· en· W2407868082 on OpenAlexvenueaboutno aff
Eric Wooltorton

Bibliographic record

VenueCanadian Medical Association Journal · 2002
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicKnee injuries and reconstruction techniques
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMedicineMeniscusKnee JointTearsSurgeryOrthodontics
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Meniscus: from the Greek meniskos, the diminutive of mene (moon).1 Two of these semi-lunar cartilages occupy each knee. Once described as muscle remnants and ascribed few functions, the menisci are now known to transmit tibio–femoral load, absorb shock, prevent synovial impingement, lubricate the joint and assist the surfaces in gliding over one another.2 Meniscal injuries are common in intense athletic activities involving twisting, jumping and sudden deceleration — 2 of the 22 Olympic athletes admitted to Atlanta hospitals during the 1996 Olympic Games had meniscal tears3 — but can also occur through more benign mechanisms, presumably because of age-related meniscal degeneration.2 Symptoms of a meniscal tear can include “popping,” catching, locking and buckling of the knee, mild synovitis and joint line pain. Physical assessment for meniscal damage often includes the McMurray test.4 On its own, the McMurray test has limited sensitivity and specificity5 and is subject to a fair degree of interrater variability.6 In one study, 24 of 200 patients with a positive McMurray test result (12%) had paradoxical findings: a positive McMurray result on the unaffected side of the knee.7 MRI is often used in the diagnosis of meniscal tears, but it is an imperfect diagnostic tool. In one series of asymptomatic adults, MRI findings consistent with meniscal tears were found in 12 of 74 (16%) people.8 In 1806 the Lichtleiter, one of the earliest illuminated viewing devices, was invented to inspect vaginas, rectums and bladders.9 In 1918, Professor Kenji Takagi of Tokyo University used a cystoscope to inspect the knee of a cadaver, and in the 1950s, Dr. Masaki Watanabe, a former student of Takagi, developed the first truly functional arthroscopes. At the 1964 Tokyo Olympics, Canadian team orthopedic surgeon Robert Jackson started studying Watanabe's techniques and is credited with bringing arthroscopy to North America.10 Arthroscopy offered reduced pain and healing times in comparison with arthrotomy. In its 40th anniversary issue, Sports Illustrated named Jackson as one of the 40 people “who have most significantly altered or elevated the world of sports in the last four decades,”11 along with such notables as Wayne Gretzky, Muhammad Ali and Michael Jordan. There were 30 597 arthroscopies in Canada in 1999/2000 (Canadian Institute for Health Information: unpublished data), making it one of the most commonly performed orthopedic procedures in Canada. Eric Wooltorton CMAJ

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Review · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.039
Threshold uncertainty score0.130

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0020.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0020.002
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.002
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0390.010

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.013
GPT teacher head0.292
Teacher spread0.279 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreReview

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2002
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueCanadian Medical Association Journal→Same topicKnee injuries and reconstruction techniques→French-language works237,207→