ANISOTROPY OPTIMIZATION OF GIANT MAGNETOIMPEDANCE SENSORS
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
As-cast melt extracted CoFeSiBNb wires 37.5 µm in average diameter prepared by MXT Inc. of Montréal have a predominantly helical anisotropy due to residual tensile and torsional stresses quenched in during preparation. When a supplementary tensile stress is applied along the wire, its easy axis of magnetization rotates towards the transverse (or circumferential) direction, since the magnetostriction of Co-rich wires is negative. Well defined, high amplitude and steep peaks of the magnetoimpedance are obtained when the magnetoelastic anisotropy of the wire reaches an optimum in magnitude and orientation. This optimum may be obtained by fine tuning the applied stress and can be permanently quenched in the material by current annealing the wire. A 50 to 100 mA DC current was used for this purpose. The circumferential DC magnetic field associated with this current also changes the wire anisotropy. After cooling, the wire quenches-in an optimum anisotropy, which maximizes the GMI effect of the wire. Magnetic field sensors with sensitivities as high as 1 kV/(T mm) and figures of merit of about 16 ΩT were obtained as a result of this optimization, for wires driven by AC currents of 1 mArms amplitude and 10 MHz frequency.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it