MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2408038837 · doi:10.1002/slct.201600366

Cu <sup>0</sup> and Pd <sup>0</sup> loaded Organo‐Bentonites as Sponge–like Matrices for Hydrogen Reversible Capture at Ambient Conditions

2016· article· en· W2408038837 on OpenAlexafffund
Alisa V. Arus, M.N. Tahir, Radia Sennour, Tze Chieh Shiao, Lamyaa M. Sallam, Ileana Denisa Nistor, René Roy, Abdelkrim Azzouz

Bibliographic record

VenueChemistrySelect · 2016
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldChemistry
TopicNanomaterials for catalytic reactions
Canadian institutionsUniversité du Québec à Montréal
FundersNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada
KeywordsPropargylTriethoxysilaneHydrogenChemistryCycloadditionMetalAlkyneAlkeneDissolutionCatalysisPropargyl alcoholInorganic chemistryPolymer chemistryMaterials sciencePhotochemistryOrganic chemistry

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract Sponge‐like gluco‐ and thioglycerol‐organo‐bentonite hosting Cu 0 and Pd 0 subnanoparticles with high affinity towards hydrogen were synthesized through an unprecedented procedure involving a chemical grafting of (3‐azidopropyl)triethoxysilane, followed by Cu‐catalyzed azide‐alkyne cycloaddition with propargyl glucoside or triallyl propargyl pentaerythritol. Further, thioglycerol groups were attached to the alkene groups by photolysis (TEC reaction). This resulted in a structure swelling, but further Cu 0 or Pd 0 nanoparticle incorporation produced a compaction due to strong O:metal and S:metal interactions that improve metal stabilization and prevent re‐aggregation. Such a structure favored hydrogen capture via physical condensation with easy release at nearly ambient temperature at the expense of hydrogen dissolution in the metal bulk. This innovative concept opens new prospects for obtaining low cost clay‐based matrices for a truly reversible capture of hydrogen.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.001
Threshold uncertainty score0.002

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.009
GPT teacher head0.231
Teacher spread0.222 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations21
Published2016
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueChemistrySelectSame topicNanomaterials for catalytic reactionsFrench-language works237,207