El cine latinoamericano: del código realista al código postmoderno
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Resumen: En el cine latinoamericano pueden distinguirse cuatro periodos. El primero va de los anos 30 a los 60, caracterizado por los melodramas y las cabareteras. El segundo periodo corresponde a los anos 60, con un cine comprometido politica y socialmente, de denuncia, que se concibe como un arma cultural para la transformacion social. Este segundo periodo finaliza en los anos 70 con los golpes de estado. En el cine de la decada de los 70 la problematica latinoamericana recibe un tratamiento mas intimista. El nuevo cine comienza a privilegiar nuevos espacios, como las contradicciones familiares y el humor toma un papel preponderante. El cuarto periodo del cine latinoamericano es el que se esta haciendo hoy. Los cineastas manifiestan un fuerte pesimismo, acompanado de un humor corrosivo. Es un cine que tiene en comun la incorporacion de lo ludico y una caida casi total del principio de impresion de realidad. Hay tambien producciones dentro del genero biografico o documental, pero la influencia de una estetica posmodema se ha hecho sentir fuertemente, con todas sus consecuencias formales e ideologicas.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.002 | 0.003 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.006 | 0.011 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.008 | 0.005 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.004 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.017 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".