Body temperature in sedentary adults during moderate exercise: no effect from exercise the day before.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Epidemiological findings show a continued presence of exertional heat injury during military basic recruit training. Current guidelines do not consider the carry-over effects of prior exercise or exposure to high ambient temperatures on the risk of succumbing to heat illness. HYPOTHESIS: From the epidemiological evidence we hypothesized that both prior exercise and exposure to hot environments on the day before would increase the core temperature response during exercise the next day. METHODS: Seven sedentary and non heat-acclimated men and women each performed eight randomized exposures involving treadmill walking for a maximum of 2 h every 2 wk. Two separate control trials at a wet bulb globe temperature (WBGT) of 22.5 degrees C and 26.5 degrees C consisted of exercise during the morning only. Six experimental trials involved successive days of exercise with trials on the second day at either a WBGT of 22.5 degrees C or 26.5 degrees C. All of the experimental trials involved walking during the first morning at a WBGT of 22.5 degrees C. Further, four of these trials included additional exercise in the afternoon at either a WBGT of 22.5 degrees C (two trials) or 29.5 degrees C (two trials). RESULTS: There was no impact of prior exercise on the day preceding the tests at either WBGT for any of the dependent measures. Rectal temperatures increased to 38.0 degrees C at the WBGT of 22.5 degrees C and to 38.5 degrees C for trials at 26.5 degrees C. There were also no carry-over effects from exercise conducted during the preceding afternoon. CONCLUSIONS: Under situations where individuals are well hydrated, rested, and free of injury, illness, and drug use, repeated exercise bouts on successive days do not alter the thermoregulatory response to exercise.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.002 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.002 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".