MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2408528261

A Multi Scale Cognitive Architecture to Account for the Adaptive and Reflective Nature of Behaviour.

2012· article· en· W2408528261 on OpenAlexaff
Othalia Larue, Pierre Poirier, Roger Nkambou

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldComputer Science
TopicCognitive Science and Mapping
Canadian institutionsUniversité du Québec à Montréal
Fundersnot available
KeywordsComputer scienceCognitive architectureCognitionContext (archaeology)ArchitectureScale (ratio)Cognitive systemsSituational ethicsArtificial intelligenceAdaptive behaviorCognitive psychologyCognitive scienceHuman–computer interactionPsychologySocial psychologyNeuroscience
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

We present a multi-agent cognitive architecture in which reactive and sequential processes can dynamically influence each other to insure that behaviour is responsive to current context (behavioural and situational) while sensitive to the longer term behavioural sequences needed to solve complex problems. We present the implementation of such a system using an agent based approach and illustrate its processing trough the simulation of two psychological tasks.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Methods · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.857
Threshold uncertainty score0.271

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.032
GPT teacher head0.320
Teacher spread0.288 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreMethods

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2012
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicCognitive Science and MappingFrench-language works237,207