PFS-<i>b</i>-PNIPAM: A First Step toward Polymeric Nanofibrillar Hydrogels Based on Uniform Fiber-Like Micelles
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Amphiphilic crystalline-coil diblock copolymers polyferrocenyldimethylsilane- block -poly( N -isopropylacrylamide) of two different block ratios (PFS 56 - b -PNIPAM 190 and PFS 26 - b -PNIPAM 520 ) were synthesized by a copper-catalyzed azide–alkyne coupling reaction. They exhibited pronounced differences in self-assembly in alcohol solvents. While PFS 56 - b -PNIPAM 190 formed mixtures of spherical and rod-like micelles in ethanol and 2-propanol, PFS 26 - b -PNIPAM 520 formed long fibers of uniform width in these solvents. We used a seeded growth protocol to grow rod-like PFS 26 - b -PNIPAM 520 micelles of uniform lengths. There were two surprising features of this experiment: First, micelle growth was unusually slow and required a long aging time (40 days) for them to reach their final length. Second, the micelles were characterized by a low number of polymer chains per unit length as determined by multiangle light scattering. This result suggests a loose packing of PFS chains in the micelle core. In an attempt to prepare thermoresponsive nanofibrillar hydrogels from these micelles, we explored approaches to transfer them from 2-propanol to water. These attempts were accompanied by extensive fragmentation of the micelles. We believe the fragility of these micelles is related to the loosely packed nature of the PFS chains in the micelle core. Fragmentation may also be affected by the cononsolvency effect of 2-propanol-water mixtures on the PNIPAM corona of the micelles. We could show, however, that the micelle fragments in water retained their anticipated thermoresponsive behavior.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".