MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2408855492 · doi:10.3399/bjgp13x674495

Outside the Box

2013· article· en· W2408855492 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Trisha Greenhalgh

Bibliographic record

VenueBritish Journal of General Practice · 2013
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicConferences and Exhibitions Management
Canadian institutionsnot available
FundersNational Institute for Health and Care Research
KeywordsPrideSet (abstract data type)Spare timeComputer scienceMedical educationKey (lock)MedicineHumanitiesArtComputer security

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

![][1]</img> I have just waved my latest successful PhD student off home to Canada after his viva examination. I am always proud of doctoral success, but in this case my pride was enhanced by the fact that he is over 60 and a full-time clinician. We have known each other for 9 years: 3 while he completed a distance learning master’s degree and another 6 while he worked, in his ‘spare time’, to build on his early ideas, formulate a research question, learn a set of empirical techniques, systematically study a focused topic, analyse his data, summarise his key findings and defend his conclusions. Like many of my mature students, this clinician was self-funded. When he began his postgraduate studies, he was already in a senior … [1]: /embed/graphic-1.gif

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.899
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.022
GPT teacher head0.307
Teacher spread0.286 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2013
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueBritish Journal of General PracticeSame topicConferences and Exhibitions ManagementFrench-language works237,207