MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2409044083

L’ermeneutica del Vaticano II e la metafisica della partecipazione

2014· article· it· W2409044083 on OpenAlex
Alain Contat

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

venuePublished in a venue whose home country is Canada.
no affNo Canadian affiliation: this work is invisible to an affiliation-only frame.
No Canadian affiliation. An affiliation-only frame, the usual design, would never have seen this work. It is one of the works that make the case for inverting the frame.

Bibliographic record

VenueAlpha Omegan · 2014
Typearticle
Languageit
FieldArts and Humanities
TopicTheology and Canon Law Studies
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsHumanitiesPhilosophy
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Sommario: In questo studio, abbiamo cercato di stabilire se e come la metafisica della partecipazione puo offrire uno strumento valido per l’“ermeneutica della riforma nella continuita” che Benedetto XVI auspicava in vista di una giusta comprensione del Vaticano II. Ispirandoci all’ontologia di Cornelio Fabro ed all’ecclesiologia di Charles Journet, investighiamo e ordiniamo sotto questa luce cinque grandi novita del Concilio: 1. La “sussistenza” della Chiesa di Cri¬sto nella Chiesa Cattolica, che da sola dispone della totalita del dispositivo salvifico, rimanda a cio che chiamiamo l’“ecclesialita per essenza”; 2. la presenza di “elementi di santificazione” al di la dei confini visibili della Chiesa cattolica evidenzia la realta di una “ecclesialita per partecipazione”; 3. i “raggi di verita” operanti nelle comunita e denominazioni religiose non cristiane vanno interpretati come disposizioni che manifestano la partecipabilita della condizione umana alla Rivelazione cristica; 4. la liberta civile in materia religiosa risulta dalla trascendenza della persona umana rispetto allo Stato in questa sfera; 5. l’esistenza di un duplice soggetto della suprema potesta magisteriale e giurisdizionale, nella Chiesa, costituisce un caso assai originale di partecipazione univoca alla stessa perfezione. Parole chiave: Tommaso d’Aquino, Cornelio Fabro, Charles Journet, ermeneutica di continu¬ita, ecclesiologia conciliare, metafisica della partecipazione, gradi di appartenenza alla Chiesa, liberta religiosa, collegio episcopale. Abstract: In this study, we have sought to establish if and how the metaphysics of participation can offer a valid instrument for the “hermeneutics of reform in continuity”, which Pope Benedict XVI encouraged for a correct understanding of Vatican II. Using the ontology of Cornelio Fabro and the ecclesiology of Charles Journet as inspiration, we have studied and organized under this light five great novelties of the Council: 1. the “subsistence” of the Church of Christ in the Catholic Church, which alone has the totality of the means of salvation, refers to “ecclesiality per essentiam”; 2. The presence of “elements of sanctification” beyond the visible limits of the Catholic Church manifests the reality of an “ecclesiality per participationem”; 3. the “strains of truth”, at work in the non-Christian communities and denominations are interpreted as means that manifest the participability of the human condition to Christic Revelation; 4. civil liberty in religious matters, results from the transcendence of the human person with respect to the State in this sphere; 5. the existence of a twofold subject of supreme magisterial and jurisdictional power in the Church, constitutes a very particular case of univocal participation in the same perfection. Key words: Thomas Aquinas, Cornelio Fabro, Charles Journet, Hermeneutic of continuity, conciliar ecclesiology, metaphysics of participation, degrees of belonging to the Church, reli¬gious freedom, Episcopal college.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Science and technology studies, Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Theoretical or conceptual · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.942
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0020.002
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0040.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.017
GPT teacher head0.228
Teacher spread0.211 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it