MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2409101455 · doi:10.1109/tnsre.2016.2562180

Cascaded Adaptation Framework for Fast Calibration of Myoelectric Control

2016· article· en· W2409101455 on OpenAlexaff
Xiangyang Zhu, Jianwei Liu, Dingguo Zhang, Xinjun Sheng, Ning Jiang

Bibliographic record

VenueIEEE Transactions on Neural Systems and Rehabilitation Engineering · 2016
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicMuscle activation and electromyography studies
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Waterloo
FundersNational Natural Science Foundation of China
KeywordsLinear discriminant analysisSession (web analytics)Computer scienceCalibrationAdaptation (eye)Training setSet (abstract data type)Artificial intelligencePattern recognition (psychology)Machine learningSpeech recognitionData miningStatisticsMathematicsPsychology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

In spite of several decades of intensive research and development, the existing algorithms of myoelectric pattern recognition (MPR) are yet to make significant clinical and commercial impact. This study focuses on the one of the limiting factors of current algorithms: degradation of algorithm performance due to the inherent non-stationarity in electromyography (EMG) signals and the consequent need for frequent re-training and re-calibration. In order to reduce the re-calibration time required for donning/doffing between sessions and avoid to need to re-calibrate within a given session while donning, we propose a cascaded adaptation (CA) framework based on linear discriminant analysis (LDA), which automatically incorporates models from previous sessions in the model calibration for the current session. The framework also updates the model parameters according to new data samples and the corresponding recognized labels. Both off-line analysis (with data from eight intact-limbed subjects and three trans-radial amputees) and online testing with 9 intact-limbed subjects were conducted to evaluate the proposed method. Results show that the LDA embedded with CA (LDA-CA) is able to classify 11 types of motion with a small training data set, beginning from the second session of the experiment. The proposed LDA-CA obtains better performance as compared with three other methods-baseline LDA (LDA-BL), LDA with self-enhancing (LDA-SE), and LDA with domain adaptation (LDA-DA). The online test demonstrates that LDA-CA requiring an initial 1 min training session can be reliably used for 8 h without re-training. The proposed myoelectric control framework with low calibration burden has the potential to move the MPR based prostheses from academic research to clinical application.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.931
Threshold uncertainty score0.436

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.008
GPT teacher head0.202
Teacher spread0.193 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations50
Published2016
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueIEEE Transactions on Neural Systems and Rehabilitation EngineeringSame topicMuscle activation and electromyography studiesFrench-language works237,207