MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2409159639 · doi:10.18192/olbiwp.v6i0.1131

Le modèle FCP de l’Université Simon Fraser : une immersion multidisciplinaire, expérientielle et communautaire

2015· article· fr· W2409159639 on OpenAlexaffvenue
Bettina B. Cenerelli

Bibliographic record

VenueOLBI Journal · 2015
Typearticle
Languagefr
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicCanadian Identity and History
Canadian institutionsFrancophone University Association
Fundersnot available
KeywordsHumanitiesArtSociology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Dans cet article, l’auteure présente le modèle d’immersion utilisé dans le French Cohort Program(FCP) de l’Université Simon Fraser en Colombie- Britannique. Les cours du FCP forment un ensemble intégré d’immersion caractérisé par un apprentissage multidisciplinaire, expérientiel et communautaire. L’article explique le caractère unique de ce programme, unique non seulement en raison de son rôle au niveau de l’éducation postsecondaire en langue française, mais également en raison des étudiants qu’il attire et des modèles d’enseignement qu’il met de l’avant.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.004
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.005
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Qualitative · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.980
Threshold uncertainty score0.472

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0040.005
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.001
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0050.007
Scholarly communication0.0070.003
Open science0.0010.005
Research integrity0.0010.002
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0110.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.024
GPT teacher head0.244
Teacher spread0.220 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designQualitative
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2015
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueOLBI JournalSame topicCanadian Identity and HistoryFrench-language works237,207