Bibliographic record
Abstract
Genet?" 3 (Esslin 1988: 12) Uspjehom knjige, odnosno uspjehom njenoga naslova, naziv teatar apsurda postao je nekom vrstom pońtapalice te se poĉeo pogreńno rabiti kao filozofski pojam ili naziv za knjiņevni pokret.Dramatiĉari koje Esslin navodi 4 doista pokazuju sliĉne tendencije u svojim djelima, ali to ne iskljuĉuje ĉinjenicu da su u drugim pogledima potpuno razliĉiti te da se oni sami nisu smatrali dijelom nekakve knjiņevne ńkole, odnosno nisu tvorili nikakav knjiņevni pokret.Ńtovińe, većina autora nije niti bila zadovoljna nametnutom im etiketom teatra apsurda te je prednost davala drugim nazivima, poput antiteatar ili novi teatar.Nadalje, Beckett, Ionesco, Adamov, Arrabal i ostatak dramatiĉara apsurda koji su pedesetih i ńezdesetih godina prońloga stoljeća stvarali u Parizu potjeĉu iz razliĉitih kulturnih sredina; Irske, Rumunjske, Rusije i Ńpanjolske (jedini Francuz meĊu njima bio je Jean Genet), a kako je većina spomenutih dramatiĉara u doba razvoja drame apsurda bila već u pedesetim godinama ņivota, bań ih i ne moņemo smatrati mladim buntovnicima.MeĊutim, ono ńto su svi dijelili odreĊeni je stav o ĉovjekovu poloņaju u svijetu za koji su smatrali da je besmislen te da nije u skladu s njegovim okruņenjem (apsurd doslovno znaĉi neskladan).Stanje metafiziĉke tjeskobe i straha, koje proizlazi iz takve svijesti o kaosu svijeta i nedostatku smisla u svemu ńto radimo, bilo je tako sredińnja tema većine drama apsurda.Iako nastanak teatra apsurda ĉesto smjeńtaju u doba avangardnih umjetniĉkih eksperimenata dvadesetih i tridesetih godina 20.stoljeća, njegovi korijeni seņu mnogo dalje.5 Elemente i utjecaje teatra apsurda moņemo naći u antiĉkoj mimici, kod klauna i dvorskih luda srednjega vijeka, u talijanskoj komediji dell'arte, pa preko komiĉara varijetea i vodvilja, sve do nijemoga filma i komedija Charlieja Chaplina i Bustera Keatona te ranih zvuĉnih filmova i 3 "A term like Theatre of the Absurd is a working hypothesis, a device to make certain fundamental traits which seem to be present in the works of number of dramatists accessible to discussion by tracing the features they have in common.That and no more.How could that have led to the assumption that Beckett and Ionesco should behave towards each other as members of the same club or party?Or that Pinter subscribed to the same views on politic and law as Genet?" Ovaj citat, kao i sve sljedeće, prevela je autorica rada Iva Ĉelan.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.002 | 0.004 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.010 | 0.008 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.013 | 0.006 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.010 |
| Research integrity | 0.002 | 0.005 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.049 | 0.009 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".