Morphological, thermal, mechanical, and rheological properties of high density polyethylene reinforced with Illite clay
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
In this work, Illite (natural Moroccan clay) was selected to reinforce high density polyethylene (HDPE) and to determine the efficiency of styrene‐(ethylene‐butene)‐styrene triblock copolymer grafted with maleic anhydride (SEBS‐ g ‐MA) as a coupling agent. The composites were prepared by extrusion followed by injection molding of various clay contents (5–40 wt%). From the samples produced, the morphological, thermal, mechanical, and rheological properties were measured. The results showed that interfacial adhesion was improved with coupling agent addition leading to increased Young's modulus, as well as higher tensile strength, and strain at yield. Nevertheless, the maximum value for the composites without SEBS‐ g ‐MA (57% modulus increase) was obtained at 20 wt% compared to 15 wt% for the composites with SEBS‐ g ‐MA (45% modulus increase). The thermal stability of the composites also increased with clay content, especially when the coupling agent was added. Finally, water absorption tests revealed that the composites have a higher tendency to absorb water with increasing clay content, but the use of a coupling agent substantially reduced this problem. POLYM. COMPOS., 39:1522–1533, 2018. © 2016 Society of Plastics Engineers
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it