MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2409234824 · doi:10.1057/9781137333629_5

The ‘New Morocco’ Settlement between Trier and Euren, Germany: Drawing Boundaries and Constructing Deviance, 1925–1933

2014· book-chapter· en· W2409234824 on OpenAlexaff
Tamara Stazic-Wendt

Bibliographic record

VenuePalgrave Macmillan UK eBooks · 2014
Typebook-chapter
Languageen
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicEuropean history and politics
Canadian institutionsOccupational Cancer Research Centre
Fundersnot available
KeywordsCasualPublic housingWelfare statePolitical scienceSociologyLaw

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The Weimar Republic not only saw a breakthrough in the building of social housing, but also a continuing housing crisis, which became one of the most pressing social problems after the First World War. Above all, there was a lack of inexpensive small dwellings that poorer people, who were particularly affected by the housing crisis, could afford. The working poor and casual labourers, the unemployed and those receiv- ing welfare benefits, the chronically ill, families with many children and single mothers profited only to a limited degree from the promise of ‘new buildings’ (Neues Bauen) for the ‘modern man’ (Neuer Mensch). 1 Those who lived in these airy, healthy new buildings were predomi- nantly members of the so-called social middle classes. It was not until these groups moved into their Eigenheim (own homes), likewise state subsidized, in the 1970s that these products of social hygiene from the interwar period — now no longer ‘good addresses’ — became available to the ‘new poor’. 2 These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Qualitative · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.103
Threshold uncertainty score0.204

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0060.009
Scholarly communication0.0020.001
Open science0.0010.002
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0040.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.025
GPT teacher head0.262
Teacher spread0.238 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designQualitative
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2014
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venuePalgrave Macmillan UK eBooksSame topicEuropean history and politicsFrench-language works237,207