MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2409289875 · doi:10.1109/icit.2016.7474925

A general space-vector modulation technique for multilevel NPC inverter

2016· article· en· W2409289875 on OpenAlexaff
Pouria Qashqai, Hani Vahedi, Abdolreza Sheikholeslami, Kamal Al‐Haddad

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicMultilevel Inverters and Converters
Canadian institutionsÉcole de Technologie SupérieureUniversité du Québec à Montréal
Fundersnot available
KeywordsInverterMATLABSpace vectorSpace vector modulationComputer scienceModulation (music)Point (geometry)Nonlinear systemComputationElectronic engineeringSupport vector machineControl theory (sociology)AlgorithmTopology (electrical circuits)MathematicsEngineeringVoltageArtificial intelligenceElectrical engineeringPhysics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

This paper presents a general and yet fast multilevel space-vector modulation technique, based on orientation of reference point in terms of hexagon lines. The main advantage of the proposed algorithm is the reduced volume of calculations that consequently makes it possible for implementing on cheaper microprocessors. The introduced technique in finding the reference vector location is extended to an n-level inverter while keeping its simplicity in computations. The improved technique is fully elaborated for a 3-level NPC inverter and then explained how to generalize for n-level inverters. Eventually it is implemented on a 3-level NPC inverter feeding linear/nonlinear and balanced/unbalanced loads all in Matlab/Simulink environment. Results are shown and discussed to prove the good dynamic performance of the introduced SVM approach in producing appropriate switching pulses for NPC inverter semiconductor devices.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.003
Threshold uncertainty score0.011

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0030.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.019
GPT teacher head0.223
Teacher spread0.204 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations7
Published2016
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicMultilevel Inverters and ConvertersFrench-language works237,207