MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W2409341400

Clinical symptoms and social functioning among immigrant and greek patients with schizophrenia: A comparative study.

2009· article· en· W2409341400 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Helen Lempesi, D. Ploumpidis, V.P. Kontaxakis, B.J. Havaki-Kontaxaki, George Konstantakopoulos, Fragiskos Gonidakis, G.N. Papadimitriou

Bibliographic record

VenuePubMed · 2009
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldPsychology
TopicMigration, Health and Trauma
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsPositive and Negative Syndrome ScaleMultivariate analysis of varianceSchizophrenia (object-oriented programming)PsychopathologyGlobal Assessment of FunctioningClinical psychologyAnalysis of variancePsychiatryPsychologyMultivariate analysisImmigrationMedicinePsychosisInternal medicine
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Migration is considered an important risk factor for schizophrenia. However, studies on the differences in psychotic symptomatology between immigrants and native patients revealed mixed results. This study compared clinical symptoms and social functioning between immigrant and native patients with schizophrenia in Greece in order to examine the influence of social factors on the disorder's manifestation and severity. A structured questionnaire including demographic and clinical information was administered to two groups of patients with schizophrenia; the first one was comprised of 65 immigrant patients (38 men and 27 women) and the second included 58 greek patients (35 men and 23 women). Patients' psychopathology was evaluated by the Positive and Negative Syndrome Scale (PANSS), the Calgary Depression Scale for Schizophrenia (CDSS) and the Global Assessment of Functioning Scale (GAF). The x2 test and the ANOVA were used for the comparisons of categorical and continuous variables respectively between the two groups of patients. Analysis of eigenvalues and multivariate analysis (MANOVA) were also used. Age and duration of illness were significant greater in the greek group of patients. Lack of insight was the only reason of hospitalization of immigrant patients. The immigrant group of patients had significantly lower scores in the negative syndrome subscale, the general psychopathology subscale and the total PANSS scale while they had significantly higher scores in the GAF scale. No between patients' groups difference was found on CDSS scores. Analysis of eigenvalues and MANOVA revealed that the national group (immigrants vs native) and the reason of admission were the only general variables with significant influence on patients' psychopathological features and functioning. Consistently with previous studies that have shown better prognosis in immigrant compared to the native patients with schizophrenia, immigrant patients in our study had milder negative and total psychotic symptomatology and were less impaired in terms of global functioning than the greek group. Being an immigrant appears to be an important factor related to these differences between our study groups. A possible explanation of our findings could be that immigrant patients with schizophrenia attending to greek mental health services have been 'filtered'because of a 'salmon bias' type phenomenon; the severe ill usually return to their country of birth due to the lack of financial and social support for immigrant patients in Greece. An alternative hypothesis is that the families and the local communities of immigrant patients with schizophrenia, being tied enough, provide support to their ill members that results in better outcome, especially with respect to negative syndrome and social functioning.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.004
Threshold uncertainty score0.008

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.001
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.034
GPT teacher head0.310
Teacher spread0.276 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations3
Published2009
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venuePubMed→Same topicMigration, Health and Trauma→French-language works237,207→