MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2409363919 · doi:10.18309/anp.v1i38.842

Entre crônica e reportagem, familiaridade e exotismo: Françoise em Paris (La Patrie, 1900)

2015· article· pt· W2409363919 on OpenAlexaffabout
Guillaume Pinson

Bibliographic record

VenueRevista da Anpoll · 2015
Typearticle
Languagept
FieldArts and Humanities
TopicLinguistics and Discourse Analysis
Canadian institutionsUniversité Laval
Fundersnot available
KeywordsHumanitiesArtPhilosophy

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Por volta de 1900, a imprensa quebequense passa por grandes transformações. Jornais como La Presse, La Patrie e Montreal Star passam a priorizar a informação e a reportagem. Contudo, ainda pouco se conhece sobre a história da reportagem no Québec. Neste artigo, proponho-me a analisar principalmente as crônicas de Françoise (pseudônimo de Robertine Barry), exemplo ímpar da transição poética entre a crônica e a reportagem no Canadá francês. Os textos que Françoise publica em La Patrie por ocasião da Exposição Universal de 1900 se mostram ao mesmo tempo como crônica mundana expatriada, crítica cultural, narrativa de viagem e reportagem. Esta é a hibridez genérica que pretendemos investigar a partir da reflexão sobre diversos aspectos deste corpus: o de ter sido escrito por uma mulher jornalista, grande figura ligada ao gênero mais antigo da crônica, praticante de uma reportagem que não se anuncia como tal. Há nesses textos uma série de traços característicos dos primórdios da reportagem quebequense, que se baseia em empréstimos de gêneros mais familiares como a crônica e se interessa por objetos culturalmente e linguisticamente próximos, mas geograficamente distantes. A partir desse estudo, poderemos, portanto, compreender como a reportagem se impôs progressivamente adotando alguns procedimentos típicos da crônica. This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 License.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Scholarly communication, Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.759
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0030.000
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0050.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.047
GPT teacher head0.284
Teacher spread0.237 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; both teacher heads agree on what is shown here.

Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2015
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueRevista da AnpollSame topicLinguistics and Discourse AnalysisFrench-language works237,207