MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

Understanding the internal structures of X(4140), X(4274), X(4500) and X(4700)

2017· article· en· W2409416632 on OpenAlexafffund

Bibliographic record

VenueThe European Physical Journal C · 2017
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldPhysics and Astronomy
TopicQuantum Chromodynamics and Particle Interactions
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Saskatchewan
FundersNational Key Research and Development Program of ChinaFundamental Research Funds for the Central UniversitiesMinistry of Education of the People's Republic of ChinaNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of CanadaNational Natural Science Foundation of China
KeywordsTetraquarkInvariant (physics)Invariant massQuantum chromodynamicsQuarkQCD sum rulesState (computer science)

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

We investigate the newly observed X(4500) and X(4700) based on the diquark–antidiquark configuration within the framework of QCD sum rules. Both of them may be interpreted as the D-wave $$cs\bar{c}\bar{s}$$ tetraquark states of $$J^P = 0^+$$ , but with opposite color structures, which is remarkably similar to the result obtained in Chen and Zhu (Phys Rev D 83:034010, 2011) that X(4140) and X(4274) can be both interpreted as the S-wave $$cs\bar{c}\bar{s}$$ tetraquark states of $$J^P = 1^+$$ , also with opposite color structures. However, the extracted masses and these suggested assignments to these X states do depend on these running quark masses where $$m_s (2\,\text{ GeV }) = 95 \pm 5$$ MeV and $$m_c (m_c) = 1.23 \pm 0.09$$ GeV. As a byproduct, the masses of the hidden-bottom partner states of X(4500) and X(4700) are extracted to be both around 10.64 GeV, which can be searched for in the $$\Upsilon \phi $$ invariant mass distribution.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Theoretical or conceptual · Consensus signal: Theoretical or conceptual
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.109
Threshold uncertainty score0.798

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.056
GPT teacher head0.304
Teacher spread0.248 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designTheoretical or conceptual
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations58
Published2017
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueThe European Physical Journal CSame topicQuantum Chromodynamics and Particle InteractionsFrench-language works237,207