MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2409501543 · doi:10.3917/rfea.144.0095

Identifying and Advancing the Treaty Rights to Health… Signed from 1871 and 1906 in Manitoba

2016· article· fr· W2409501543 on OpenAlexaffabout
Yvonne Boyer, Sheyenne Spence

Bibliographic record

VenueRevue française d’études américaines · 2016
Typearticle
Languagefr
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicCanadian Identity and History
Canadian institutionsFirst Nations Health and Social Secretariat of ManitobaUniversity of Manitoba
Fundersnot available
KeywordsHumanitiesEthnologyTreatyPolitical scienceSign (mathematics)NaturalizationConstitutionArtHistoryLawPoliticsCitizenship

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Les traités signés entre les Premières nations et le gouvernement canadien sont formellement inscrits dans la Constitution du pays et sont en cela la loi suprême du Canada. Les droits des autochtones et ceux découlant des traités qu’ils ont signés furent reconnus et confirmés par l’article 35 de la Loi constitutionnelle canadienne de 1982. Les traités numérotés furent signés avec les Premières nations entre 1871 et 1921. Au Manitoba, sept traités furent ainsi signés avec les Premières nations. Alors que des services de santé furent promis au cours des négociations de l’ensemble des traités numérotés, seul le Traité 6 comporte l’accord écrit selon lequel une armoire à pharmacie devait être fournie aux signataires. Cet article analyse les accords oraux et écrits concernant les droits à la santé dans les traités numérotés signés au Manitoba. L’analyse juridique établit le principe selon lequel les Premières nations du Manitoba possèdent des droits à la santé et aux services médicaux.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesScience and technology studies
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.926
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.020
GPT teacher head0.250
Teacher spread0.230 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2016
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueRevue française d’études américainesSame topicCanadian Identity and HistoryFrench-language works237,207