L’antropologia di Romano Guardini in Mondo e Persona: Struttura, senso, valore
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Summary: This article presents a philosophical commentary on the concept of Person developed by Romano Guardini in World and Person (1939), targeting specifically the first two chapters of part II of the book’s which contain the pages with greater philosophical relevance. Special attention is given to the way in which Guardini synthesized elements drawn from anthropological currents such as existentialism, phenomenology, dialogical philosophy and personalism. The commentary seeks to highlight the structure he provides, which ensures the philosophical unity of the section examined. Guardini’s theoretical relation with some of the main thinkers of his day is also considered. The closing section of the article presents a series of comments on some of Guardini’s most valuable anthropological teachings. Key words: Guardini, person, existence, I-You, relationship, polarity. Parole chiave: Guardini, persona, esistenza, Io-Tu, relazione, polarita.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it