MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2409700753

Annual incidence of type 1 diabetes in Québec between 1989-2000 in children.

2006· article· en· W2409700753 on OpenAlexaffabout
Laurent Legault, Constantin Polychronakos

Bibliographic record

VenuePubMed · 2006
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldBiochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology
TopicDiabetes and associated disorders
Canadian institutionsMcGill UniversityMontreal Children's Hospital
Fundersnot available
KeywordsIncidence (geometry)MedicineDemographySecular variationPediatricsDiabetes mellitusPopulationGovernment (linguistics)Environmental healthEndocrinology
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

PURPOSE: To document the number of new pediatric cases of type 1 diabetes diagnosed each year, from 1989 to 2000, in the province of Québec. To analyze secular trends and age of presentation during the same period. METHODS: Data, gathered through a government allocation program, provided the number of reported new cases. The data bank also made available the age at diagnosis, sex and geographic distribution of cases. RESULTS: A steady number of new cases, approximately 240 p.a., was diagnosed over the 12-years. The annual incidence in the pediatric population of Québec was 15 per 100,000. There was no trend towards earlier age at diagnosis. CONCLUSIONS: We found no evidence of increase in the number of children diagnosed with type 1 diabetes in Québec between 1989-2000. Also, over the same period, the data did not support a younger age at diagnosis.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.035
Threshold uncertainty score0.081

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0020.002
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.000
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.003
GPT teacher head0.185
Teacher spread0.182 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations18
Published2006
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venuePubMedSame topicDiabetes and associated disordersFrench-language works237,207