MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2409882009 · doi:10.1109/tpwrs.2016.2576901

An Enhanced DC Voltage Droop-Control for the VSC--HVDC Grid

2016· article· en· W2409882009 on OpenAlexaff
Haifeng Li, Chongru Liu, Gengyin Li, Reza Iravani

Bibliographic record

VenueIEEE Transactions on Power Systems · 2016
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicHVDC Systems and Fault Protection
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Toronto
FundersNational High-tech Research and Development ProgramProgram for New Century Excellent Talents in UniversityNational Natural Science Foundation of China
KeywordsVoltage droopVoltage sourceHigh-voltage direct currentControl theory (sociology)GridModular designEngineeringVoltageAC powerTransient (computer programming)Electronic engineeringComputer scienceDirect currentElectrical engineeringControl (management)Mathematics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

This paper introduces an enhanced droop-based dc-voltage control method, including dead-band, for applications to the high-voltage direct-current (HVDC) grid that utilizes the voltage-sourced converter (VSC) technology. The proposed droop-control structure also autonomously imposes energy balance between the HVDC grid and its host ac system. The droop-control method (1) divides the VSC stations into four groups, (2) activates the droop-control of each group based on a prespecified voltage margin, and (3) introduces an improved power-voltage characteristic for desirable VSC station dynamic performance. Feasibility and performance of the proposed control method are evaluated based on time-domain simulation studies in the PSCAD platform, using the IEEE-39-Bus system that imbeds a five-terminal VSC-HVDC grid. Each VSC station is a monopolar modular multilevel converter (MMC). The study results show that the proposed droop-control method enables the HVDC-AC system to reach a new steady state after transient events.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.002
Threshold uncertainty score0.006

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.008
GPT teacher head0.218
Teacher spread0.210 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations66
Published2016
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueIEEE Transactions on Power SystemsSame topicHVDC Systems and Fault ProtectionFrench-language works237,207