MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W2409898516

Neuroendocrine Gene Regulation in Hypothalamic Cell Lines

2010· article· en· W2409898516 on OpenAlexaff
Sandeep Dhillon, Ginah L. Kim, Denise D. Belsham

Bibliographic record

VenueThe Open Neuroendocrinology Journal · 2010
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldNeuroscience
TopicRegulation of Appetite and Obesity
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Toronto
Fundersnot available
KeywordsBiologyNeuropeptideEffectorHypothalamusPopulationGene expressionCell typeNeuroscienceLeptinCell biologyRegulation of gene expressionHormoneNeurotensinEnergy homeostasisGeneCellGeneticsEndocrinologyReceptor
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The physiological system implicated in the maintenance of energy homeostasis is situated predominantly in the hypothalamus. However, due to the inherent difficulty of studying individual neurons in the brain through in vivo analysis, cell models have been generated to investigate the direct action of hormones or other physiological compounds on metabolic effectors, such as neuropeptides, located in specific cell types from the hypothalamus. Immortalized, clonal cell lines represent an unlimited, homogeneous neuronal population that can be manipulated using a number of molecular techniques. In particular, cell lines have proven to be indispensable in the study of gene structure, gene expression and characterizing the molecular mechanisms responsible for regulating gene expression. In this review, we summarize recent studies that examine the direct transcriptional regulation of neuropeptide Y (NPY) by insulin and the leptin-mediated control of neurotensin (NT) gene expression. The use of these novel cell models has contributed profoundly to our understanding of how peripheral hormones, neuromodulators and neurontransmitters regulate transcriptional events that may ultimately contribute to the control of feeding behaviour.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.006
Threshold uncertainty score0.021

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.000
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0010.002
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0060.005

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.031
GPT teacher head0.282
Teacher spread0.252 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2010
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueThe Open Neuroendocrinology Journal→Same topicRegulation of Appetite and Obesity→French-language works237,207→