MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2409971546 · doi:10.1385/1-59259-174-4:153

Function of Thyroid Hormone Receptors During Amphibian Development

2003· review· en· W2409971546 on OpenAlexaff
Sashko Damjanovski, Laurent M. Sachs, Yun‐Bo Shi

Bibliographic record

VenueHumana Press eBooks · 2003
Typereview
Languageen
FieldBiochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology
TopicRetinoids in leukemia and cellular processes
Canadian institutionsWestern University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMetamorphosisAmphibianBiologyTadpole (physics)HormoneThyroidEndocrinologyVertebrateInternal medicineReceptorOrganogenesisLarvaEcologyGenetics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Thyroid hormone (T3) plays important roles during vertebrate development (). In humans, T3 is detected in the embryonic plasma by 6 mo and rises to high levels around birth (). During this postembryonic period, extensive tissue remodeling and organogenesis take place. T3 deficiency during human development leads to developmental defects, such as mental retardation, short stature, and in the most severe form, cretinism (,). Likewise, T3 is also critical for amphibian development. It is the controlling agent of anuran metamorphosis, a process that transforms a tadpole into a tailless frog (,). Blocking synthesis of endogenous T3 leads to the formation of giant tadpoles that cannot metamorphose, while addition of exogenous T3 to premetamorphic tadpoles causes precocious metamorphosis. Importantly, most, if not all, organs are genetically predetermined to undergo specific changes, and these changes are organ autonomous. Thus, T3 appears to act directly on individual metamorphosing organs. Such properties have made anuran metamorphosis one of the best-studied postembryonic developmental process at morphological, cellular, and biochemical levels and paved the way for current molecular investigations of the underlying mechanisms.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Other design · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Review · Consensus signal: Review
Teacher disagreement score0.979
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.043
GPT teacher head0.277
Teacher spread0.234 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designOther design
Domainnot available
GenreReview

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations15
Published2003
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueHumana Press eBooksSame topicRetinoids in leukemia and cellular processesFrench-language works237,207