MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W2409997215 · doi:10.1017/s0317167100120815

Serial MR Imaging of Adult-Onset Rasmussen's Encephalitis

2011· article· en· W2409997215 on OpenAlexaffvenue
Myriam Irislimane, F Guilbert, Jean‐Maxime Leroux, Lionel Carmant, Dang Khoa Nguyen

Bibliographic record

VenueCanadian Journal of Neurological Sciences / Journal Canadien des Sciences Neurologiques · 2011
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicEpilepsy research and treatment
Canadian institutionsCentre Hospitalier Universitaire Sainte-JustineUniversité de MontréalHôpital Notre-Dame
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMedicineDysarthriaDysphagiaHemiparesisStatus epilepticusHyperintensityMidazolamAtaxiaAnesthesiaMagnetic resonance imagingEpilepsySurgeryPediatricsRadiology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

A 52-year-old woman was referred for a progressive neurological condition which started a year before with continuous irregular twitching of the right facial and arm muscles as well as the tongue and palate, followed by progressive dysphagia, right hemiparesis, ataxia, dysphasia and dysarthria. Though magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) at clinical presentation and a year after were both normal (Figure A1), Rasmussen's encephalitis (RE) was strongly suspected and treatment with corticosteroids and immunoglobulins were begun. A third MRI, two years after onset, revealed mild T2 hyperintense subcortical white matter changes over the left perisylvian region (Figure A) which confirmed our initial suspicion of RE as she now met clinical, electrophysiological and morphological criterias for RE. While waiting for a cerebral biopsy after unsatisfactory response from antiepileptic drugs, corticosteroids and immunoglobulins, her condition markedly worsened less than three years after onset with the sudden occurrence of status epilepticus requiring intubation and continuous infusions of midazolam and propofol.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Case report · Consensus signal: Case report
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.003
Threshold uncertainty score0.007

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0020.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.044
GPT teacher head0.292
Teacher spread0.248 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designCase report
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations6
Published2011
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueCanadian Journal of Neurological Sciences / Journal Canadien des Sciences Neurologiques→Same topicEpilepsy research and treatment→French-language works237,207→