MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2410099996 · doi:10.7748/ns.18.26.28.s39

The truth about sexually transmitted diseases

2004· article· en· W2410099996 on OpenAlexaff
Linda Thomas

Bibliographic record

VenueNursing Standard · 2004
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldHealth Professions
TopicPublic Health Policies and Education
Canadian institutionsRoyal Canadian Navy
Fundersnot available
KeywordsPublicityPillTrustworthinessPsychologyMedicineFamily medicineSocial psychologyLawPolitical scienceNursing

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The development of a contraceptive pill for men was given a whole lot of publicity a couple of weeks ago. This led, of course, to a lively debate about the general sexual trustworthiness of men, as if no woman had ever been economic with the truth about her contraceptive status. What a bunch of cynics and hypocrites we can be when it comes to sexual matters. Astoundingly ill-informed, too, for these supposedly enlightened times. Someone from the Terrence Higgins Trust cited a survey recently showing that 62 per cent of 18 to 24 year olds feel they do not have enough information about the risks of unprotected sex. This seems shocking but is perhaps borne out by statistics showing a startling rise in sexually transmitted diseases.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesScience and technology studies
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.579
Threshold uncertainty score0.998

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0030.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.035
GPT teacher head0.454
Teacher spread0.419 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2004
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueNursing StandardSame topicPublic Health Policies and EducationFrench-language works237,207