MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2410159007 · doi:10.7202/1035605ar

La nouvelle stratification sociale de la société québécoise, 1971 à 2011

2016· article· fr· W2410159007 on OpenAlexvenueno aff
Simon Langlois

Bibliographic record

VenueLes Cahiers des dix · 2016
Typearticle
Languagefr
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicSocial Sciences and Governance
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsHumanitiesPolitical sciencePhilosophy

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Nous analysons les profonds changements qui caractérisent la structure sociale de la société québécoise entre 1971 et 2011. Une véritable mutation macrosociale l’a complètement transformée, d’abord visible dans la croissance des effectifs au sein des échelons élevés de la hiérarchie sociale et dans l’avènement d’une nouvelle strate sociale, celle des techniciens. La classe des employés de bureau a rétréci, glissant du 2e rang au 5e rang et la taille de la classe ouvrière a régressée de manière considérable. L’un des aspects les plus marquants est sans contredit la féminisation de la structure sociale et surtout, la forte poussée de la présence des femmes aux échelons moyens et élevés de la hiérarchie sociale. Une nouvelle division du travail selon le sexe est en train de s’accentuer. La classe ouvrière est encore plus masculine que par le passé alors que deux autres strates sociales – celle des employés de bureau et celle des professionnels intermédiaires – sont davantage féminisées.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.039
Threshold uncertainty score0.285

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0030.003
Science and technology studies0.0040.002
Scholarly communication0.0020.001
Open science0.0000.001
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0070.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.022
GPT teacher head0.299
Teacher spread0.277 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2016
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueLes Cahiers des dixSame topicSocial Sciences and GovernanceFrench-language works237,207