Autonomia e autodeterminazione. Dio e l’uomo
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The author presents a Christian theological approach to the issue of autonomy and self determination. God has the greatest autonomy and it is He who determines himself and all creatures. Furthermore, God is Trinity, a unity of three persons, totally lacking in any self-centeredness or individualism. God creates man in His image, so also in man, as a we can recognize the characteristics of autonomy and self-determination, in the appropriate degree. Being in relationship with God is absolutely necessary to man, but the latter, as a person, is able to assume and freely welcome this relationship and to collaborate with God in bringing it to perfection. This perfect relationship is a gift from God, thanks to God’s emerging from Himself to meet man. Practical atheism in the western world understands the freedom of man as full autonomy from God. Christianity instead reveals the God who gives life and freedom, and therefore, autonomy, which is the characteristic of living beings. Human freedom is realized in communion with God, who gives life out of love, and only in this way it is realized in communion with others. In the divine life itself we humans participate directly in grace and still more in the gift of glory. Death, which seems a limit to human freedom, has been transformed by Jesus Christ into the time of the definitive encounter with God, and then in the transition to life in its fullness in the sight of God.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.003 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it