MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W2410357761 · doi:10.1149/ma2014-02/1/3

P2-Type Na<sub>2/3</sub>Fe<sub>1/3</sub>Mn<sub>1/3</sub>Co<sub>1/3</sub>O<sub>2</sub> As a New Positive Electrode for Na-Ion Batteries

2014· article· en· W2410357761 on OpenAlexaff
J. S. Thorne, R. A. Dunlap, M. N. Obrovac

Bibliographic record

VenueECS Meeting Abstracts · 2014
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicAdvancements in Battery Materials
Canadian institutionsDalhousie University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMaterials scienceAnalytical Chemistry (journal)FOIL methodElectrolyteStoichiometryElectrodeSlurryIonCathodeChemistryComposite material

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Introduction A number of P2-type layered cathode materials have been synthesized as possible candidates for Na-ion battery application. These include Na2/3CoO2 [1], Na2/3Fe1/2Mn1/2O2 [2], Na2/3Co2/3Mn1/3O2 [3] among others. Each of these systems each have a unique set of promising characteristics. We have found another promising candidate for a practical Na-ion cathode material. Na2/3Mn1/3Fe1/3Co1/3O2was synthesized and was found to have high energy density, good cycling stability and low polarization. Experimental Phase pure samples were prepared by conventional solid state reaction at 950 °C in O2 from stoichiometric amounts of Na2O2, MnO2, Fe3O4 and Co3O4. X-ray diffraction (XRD) patterns were measured under Ar gas in a gas-tight sample holder. Electrodes were prepared from a slurry with 80% by weight active material, 12% Super-P carbon black and 8% PVDF binder dissolved in NMP. The slurry was then coated on Al foil using a coating bar with a 0.006" gap and dried in air for several hours at 120 °C. 2325 coin-type cells were constructed using 1M NaClO4(98% purity) dissolved in PC electrolyte with 2% by volume FEC. Two Celgard 3501 separators, one blown microfiber separator (3M Company) and a sodium foil counter electrode (Aldrich) were used. Cells were cycled with constant 10 mA/g current in indicated voltage ranges. Results and Discussion Figure 1 shows an XRD pattern of Na2/3Mn1/3Co1/3Fe1/3O2. The pattern shows no noticeable impurities. The pattern was fit using a Rietveld refinement with the P63/mmc space group. Lattice parameters of a = 2.89 Å and c = 11.1 Å were obtained, corresponding to a bulk density of 4.30 g/mL at 2/3 sodiation. Figure 2 shows the first cycle voltage profile for Na2/3Mn1/3Co1/3Fe1/3O2 when charged to different voltages. It was found that substitution of Co into NaxFe1/2Mn1/2O2causes an increase in average voltage [2, 4]. Upon sodiation from 4.5 V, an average voltage of 3.00 V is achieved with 173 Ah/kg / 745 Ah/L of reversible capacity, yielding an estimated energy density of ~ 520 Wh/kg / 2240 Wh/L. When cycled to 4.0 V, average voltage is 2.77 V but the energy density is reduced to ~ 350 Wh/kg (1510 Wh/L), resulting from less access of the high voltage plateau. Figure 2 also shows some of the consequences of accessing voltages above 4.1V using the current electrolyte formulation. Increasing use of the plateau increases voltage hysteresis and reduces reversibility, as evidenced by the decreasing negative capacity of the subsequent sodiation half-cycle. Ex-situ Mössbauer studies and the electrochemical performance of P2-type Na2/3Fe1/3Mn1/3Co1/3O2will be presented. Figure captions Figure 1 Rietveld refinement of the P2-Na2/3Fe1/3Mn1/3Co1/3O2XRD pattern. Figure 2 First cycle voltage profile of P2-Na2/3Fe1/3Mn1/3Co1/3O2at different cutoff voltages. References [1] R.Berthelot, D. Carlier & C. Delmas, Nature Mat., 10(2011) 74-80. [2] N. Yabuuchi, M. Kajiyama, J. Iwatate, H. Nishikawa, S. Hitomi, r. Okuyama, R. Usui, Y. Yamada and S. Komaba, Nature Mat., 11(2012) 512-517. [3] D. Carlier, J. H. Cheng, R. Berthelot, M. Guignard, M. Yoncheva, R.Stoyanova, B. J. Hwang and C. Delmas, Dalton Trans., 40 (2011) 9306-9312. [4] J.S. Thorne, R.A. Dunlap and M.N. Obrovac, J. Electrochem. Soc., 160 (2012) A361-A367.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.002
Threshold uncertainty score0.005

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0010.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.010
GPT teacher head0.237
Teacher spread0.226 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2014
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueECS Meeting Abstracts→Same topicAdvancements in Battery Materials→French-language works237,207→