[Recurrent neutropenia due to adulterated cocaine].
Bibliographic record
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Since 2009, a warning has been issued about cocaine that has been adulterated with levamisole, mainly in the USA and Canada. Agranulocytosis occurs as an idiosyncratic reaction in 3-10% of patients exposed to levamisole. CASE DESCRIPTION: A 36-year-old man was referred to our hospital because of an episode of high fever and infections on his hands, mouth and ears. Laboratory testing showed neutropenia. The infections were treated successfully with antibiotics. The neutropenia disappeared, but returned with recurrence of the infections. Upon presentation at the emergency care unit, the patient had signs of intoxication. This patient's urine contained metabolites of cocaine (benzoylecgonine and ecgonine methyl ester), whereupon additional testing showed levamisole to be present in serum. The patient discontinued cocaine use. Following treatment of the infections, the neutropenia fully resolved and did not recur. CONCLUSION: This patient had acquired agranulocytosis, due to the use of cocaine adulterated with levamisole.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.004 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".