α- and β-Cyclodextrin Rotaxanes of μ-Bis(4-pyridyl)bis[pentacyanoferrate(II)] Complexes
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The kinetics and mechanism of the self-assemblies of alpha- and beta-cyclodextrin (CD) [2]rotaxanes, [(NC)5Fe-[pyRpy.CD]Fe(CN)5]6-, containing pentacyanoferrate(II)-stoppered 4,4'-bis(pyridyl) threads pyRpy (R = -CH = CH-, -N=N-, -CH=N-N=CH-, and -C(CH3)=N-N=C(CH3)-) have been investigated in aqueous solution by using visible and 1H NMR spectroscopy. The rotaxanes may be formed rapidly by the addition of the [Fe(CN)5OH2]3- ion to the CD-included pyRpy thread or slowly by the addition of an excess of CD to the dimeric [(NC)5Fe(pyRpy)Fe(CN)5]6- complex. In the latter method, the mechanism involves a rate-determining dissociation of a [Fe(CN)5]3- center to form the monomeric complex, which subsequently includes the coordinated pyRpy in the CD cavity to yield the semirotaxane, which is rapidly recomplexed by the [Fe(CN)5OH2]3- ion, generating the [2]rotaxane. Rate and activation parameters and CD inclusion stability constants have been determined for the ligand substitution reactions involving the formations and dissociations of the semirotaxanes and rotaxanes. The extents of the decreases in the formation (kf) and dissociation (kd) rate constants upon CD inclusions of the free and coordinated ligands, respectively, are related to the natures of the CD hosts and the R linkage on the pyRpy guests. The semirotaxanes and rotaxanes exhibit significant bathochromic shifts in their visible MLCT transitions compared with the corresponding monomeric and dimeric iron complexes. A correlation between the extent of the decrease in kd and the change in the MLCT energy upon alpha-CD inclusions of [Fe(CN)5L]3-, where L is an aromatic N-heterocyclic 4-Rpy or pyRpy ligand, has been observed.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".