MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2410540500 · doi:10.1213/ane.0000000000000920

“You Live Life Going Forwards and Understand It Looking Backwards!” The Sixtieth Anniversary of the World Federation of Societies of Anaesthesiologists

2015· article· en· W2410540500 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
David J. Wilkinson, Hugo Van Aken

Bibliographic record

VenueAnesthesia & Analgesia · 2015
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicGlobal Health and Surgery
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMedicineInterimAnesthesiologyGeneral partnershipWorld War IILawPolitical scienceAnesthesia

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

In May 2015, the World Health Organization (WHO) adopted resolution A68/15: “Strengthening Emergency and Essential Surgical Care and Anesthesia as a Component of Universal Health Coverage.”a To make this historic resolution a reality, the World Federation of Societies of Anaesthesiologists (WFSA) unites anesthesiologists around the world to provide universal access to safe anesthesia. This mission is a partnership among the WFSA, national anesthesiology societies, and other organizations that share these objectives. THE PAST The founder of the International Anesthesia Research Society (IARS), Dr. Francis Hoeffer McMechan (1879–1939), was a great believer in increasing international collaboration among anesthesiologists.1 Initially, his efforts were focused on the United States and Canada. Subsequent travels took him to South America, Australia, and Europe to advocate formation of an international organization.2 In 1936, Robert Monard, a French surgeon, attended an IARS meeting in Philadelphia and suggested that the French should organize a similar meeting in Paris.2,3 Sadly, the Second World War delayed these innovative plans until 1951, when an international anesthesiology congress was finally held in Paris. Two weeks before that meeting, a combined meeting of the IARS and the Association of Anesthetists of Great Britain and Ireland had been held in London, and further discussions took place involving representatives from 15 countries at which Harold Griffith (1894–1985) took the chair.2 After the Paris meeting, an Interim Committee was set up to investigate the possibility of an international society, and again Griffith took the chair.4 He had been President of the IARS in 1948 and Chair of the Board of Trustees from 1949 to 1952. The committee also included 5 other anesthesiologists: Alexandre Goldblatt (Belgium), John Gillies (United Kingdom), Torsten Gordh (Sweden), Jacques Boreau (France), and Ritsema van Eck (Netherlands), together with Jean-Francisque Delafresnaye (France), who was the secretary of the Council for International Organizations of Medical Sciences (an international nongovernmental organization set up by the United Nations Educational, Scientific and Cultural Organization and WHO in 1949).4 After surveying information from all the current national anesthesiology societies around the world, the Interim Committee created a set of bylaws for a world federation (Fig. 1), which came into being on the last day of the first World Congress of Anesthesiologists, held in Scheveningen in the Netherlands from September 5 to 10, 1955 (Fig. 2).5,6 Representatives from 26 countries signed the initial document, which was approved by Queen Juliana of the Netherlands, and the new organization was registered in that country.Figure 1: Signatures approving the first Statutes of the World Federation of Societies of Anaesthesiologists (reproduced with permission from WFSA).Figure 2: Attendees of the First World Congress of the WFSA in Scheveningen, Netherlands (reproduced with permission from WFSA).The aim of this new Federation was to create an equality of anesthesia care for all patients across the world. The IARS provided tremendous financial and organizational support for the process.7 A large number of delegates to the first World Congress were supported by the IARS, and the Proceedings of the Congress were also published by the IARS. The relationship between the IARS and the WFSA was renewed in 2014 with a new memorandum of understanding on an affiliation between the 2 organizations.8 THE PRESENT The WFSA has grown substantially in the ensuing 60 years. The WFSA represents hundreds of thousands of anesthesiologists from >140 countries worldwide. The WFSA has sponsored a World Congresses every 4 years all around the globe. More details about the diverse WFSA programs promoting global anesthesia safety can be found on its website.b The 60th anniversary of the WFSA requires a celebration! The celebratory 60th Anniversary logo of the WFSA appears on the cover of this issue of Anesthesia & Analgesia. THE FUTURE The WFSA is investing in innovation and research supporting universal access to safe anesthesia. To share the knowledge and make it available to patients worldwide, a new section in Anesthesia & Analgesia now focuses on global health. The goal of this new section is to transfer basic science and clinical medical knowledge into everyday clinical practice worldwide. Advances in anesthesia care are for everyone, not just patients in high-income countries. The WFSA, the IARS, and Anesthesia & Analgesia share this vision. We are committed to improve the quality of life of patients through the provision of safe anesthesia services. This commitment has no borders. Our commitment brings us full circle to May’s momentous resolution. We add our “yea” votes to May’s unanimous vote of the WHO General Assembly, resolved to “strengthening emergency and essential surgical care and anesthesia as a component of universal health coverage.”

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.004
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.013
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Editorial · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.037
Threshold uncertainty score0.125

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0040.013
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0050.004
Scholarly communication0.0060.007
Open science0.0010.006
Research integrity0.0030.009
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0370.022

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.035
GPT teacher head0.284
Teacher spread0.249 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreEditorial

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2015
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueAnesthesia & AnalgesiaSame topicGlobal Health and SurgeryFrench-language works237,207