MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W2410606126 · doi:10.1177/070674370505000315

Re: Lorazepam-Induced Prolongation of the QT Interval in a Patient with Schizoaffective Disorder and Complete AV Block

2005· letter· en· W2410606126 on OpenAlexaffvenue
David Crockford

Bibliographic record

VenueThe Canadian Journal of Psychiatry · 2005
Typeletter
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicCardiac electrophysiology and arrhythmias
Canadian institutionsCalgary Laboratory Services
Fundersnot available
KeywordsProlongationLorazepamQT intervalSchizoaffective disorderMedicineLong QT syndromeAnesthesiaBlock (permutation group theory)Heart blockInterval (graph theory)PsychologyCardiologyElectrocardiographyPsychiatryPsychosisMathematics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Mirtazapine Combination Treatment of DepressionDear Editor: Selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors (SSRIs) may cause bleeding (1-3), probably by increasing platelet release of serotonin, which increases platelet aggregation.I report on a patient who experienced bleeding during treatment for depression when escitalopram, venlafaxine, and mirtazapine were combined but not when the same drugs were used alone.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.011
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Case report · Consensus signal: Case report
GenreCandidate signal: Commentary · Consensus signal: Commentary
Teacher disagreement score0.021
Threshold uncertainty score0.027

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.011
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.002
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0020.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.002
Open science0.0020.001
Research integrity0.0210.011
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0040.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.008
GPT teacher head0.217
Teacher spread0.209 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designCase report
Domainnot available
GenreCommentary

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations4
Published2005
Admission routes2
Has abstractno

Explore more

Same venueThe Canadian Journal of Psychiatry→Same topicCardiac electrophysiology and arrhythmias→French-language works237,207→