MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W2410610033

[Early results of modified Colonna capsular arthroplasty for young patients with unilateral hip dislocation].

2014· article· en· W2410610033 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Dianzhong Luo, Hong Zhang, Hui Cheng, Kai Xiao

Bibliographic record

VenuePubMed · 2014
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicHip disorders and treatments
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMedicineWOMACHarris Hip ScoreSurgeryOsteoarthritisArthroplastyRange of motionVisual analogue scaleBody mass indexInternal medicine
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

OBJECTIVE: To discuss the early clinical results and risk factors of modified Colonna capsular arthroplasty for young patients with unilateral hip dislocation. METHODS: From July 2011 to February 2013, 25 cases (25 hips) of modified Colonna capsular arthroplasty for unilateral hip dislocation in the 1st affiliated hospital of People's Liberation Army General hospital was collected, including 7 males, 18 females; aged 9.7-25.8 years, averaging 17.8 years; left 12 cases, right 13 cases; Body mass index ranged 15.6-29.6 kg/m², averaging 20.9 kg/m². Clinical indexes were collected, including: range of motion (ROM) of the hip, the Harris Hip Score (HHS), West Ontario and McMaster University Osteoarthritis Index (WOMAC), visual analogue scale (VAS) score before and after surgery, along with the satisfaction score of the surgery, Severin grades, and Tönnis osteoarthritis grades at last follow-up. Paired t-test was applied for the indexes before and after surgery, variances components analysis was applied for the satisfaction score and the function scores at last follow-up compared in 2 groups, aging at surgery <16 years (15 cases) and ≥ 16 years (10 cases). RESULTS: All cases were followed up for 12-18 months, mean 13.4 months. The average hip ROM decreased from 380° in average pre-surgery to 200° in average at last follow-up. Indexes decreased comparing 9 months follow-up to pre-surgery, HHS(78 ± 9 vs. 84 ± 15, t = 2.107, P = 0.046), WOMAC function score(14.8 ± 8.4 vs. 8.6 ± 9.6, t = -2.657, P = 0.014) appeared statistically difference. Indexes increased at the last follow-up, showing no statistically difference. VAS and the satisfaction score were much better in patients <16 years group compared with ≥ 16 years group at last follow-up. VAS was 1.1 ± 0.8 compared with 2.8 ± 1.4 (F = 12.810, P = 0.002), whereas the satisfaction score was 89 ± 17 compared with 66 ± 22 (F = 7.535, P = 0.012). The last radiological follow-up resulted that, Severin grade I 21 cases, grade II 1 case, grade III 2 cases, grade IV 2 cases, and the Tönnis osteoarthritis grade 0 with 5 cases, grade 1 with 12 cases, grade 2 with 7 cases, grade 3 with 1 case. CONCLUSIONS: In this early follow up, the majority of patients who underwent modified Colonna capsular arthroplasty for their unilateral hip dislocation would obtained satisfactory results, but with long term recovery, and the younger group (<16 years) with better clinical results than the elder group ( ≥ 16 years).With strict indications, exacted surgical techniques and optimized rehabilitation, the modified Colonna arthroplasty would have better clinical results.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.002
Threshold uncertainty score0.004

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.012
GPT teacher head0.211
Teacher spread0.198 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2014
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venuePubMed→Same topicHip disorders and treatments→French-language works237,207→