MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2410648284

THE LIGHTEST HIGGS BOSON MASS IN THE NEXT-TO-MINIMAL SUPERSYMMETRIC STANDARD MODEL 1

2002· article· en· W2410648284 on OpenAlexaff
Sorin Codoban, M. Jurčišin, Russian Federation

Bibliographic record

VenueHigh-Energy Physics Literature Database (CERN, DESY, Fermilab, IHEP, and SLAC) · 2002
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldPhysics and Astronomy
TopicParticle physics theoretical and experimental studies
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Toronto
Fundersnot available
KeywordsPhysicsYukawa potentialHiggs bosonParticle physicsInfrared fixed pointMinimal Supersymmetric Standard ModelStandard Model (mathematical formulation)SupersymmetrySupersymmetry breakingRenormalization groupTop quarkCoupling constantBosonQuarkGauge (firearms)Mathematical physics
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

We consider the infrared quasi fixed point solutions of the one-loop renormalization group equations for the Yukawa couplings and soft supersymmetry breaking parameters in the Nextto-Minimal Supersymmetric Standard Model. Taking as input the top-quark and Z-boson masses, the values of the gauge coupling constants and the infrared quasi fixed points for Yukawa couplings and the soft parameters, the mass of the lightest Higgs boson is discussed.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Theoretical or conceptual · Consensus signal: Theoretical or conceptual
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.324
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.020
GPT teacher head0.234
Teacher spread0.214 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designTheoretical or conceptual
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2002
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueHigh-Energy Physics Literature Database (CERN, DESY, Fermilab, IHEP, and SLAC)Same topicParticle physics theoretical and experimental studiesFrench-language works237,207