Postoperative Ergebnisse höhergradiger traumatischer Milzrupturen bei Kindern im Langzeitverlauf
Bibliographic record
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Splenic rupture is the most common injury in blunt abdominal trauma at any age. The grade of rupture, haemodynamic stability and, in the case of operative treatment, the experience of the surgeon all play an important role in preserving the spleen. Due to its important immunological function preservation of the spleen should be the goal. PATIENTS: From January 2000 to August 2009 five children (4 male/1 female) with isolated grade IV or V splenic rupture, according to the Organ Injury Score (OIS), were treated operatively. At the time of the trauma the patients were 8.8 ± 3.8 (mean ± standard deviation; range, 6–15) years old. Four patients with an OIS grade IV rupture were primarily treated with partially spleen-saving surgery: one resection of 2⁄3 of the spleen including the splenic vessels, one hemisplenectomy and two lower pole resections; in one patient with an OIS grade V rupture splenectomy was performed immediately. RESULTS: In one patient treated with a spleen-preserving approach (hemisplenectomy) the remainder of the spleen had to be removed due to acute bleeding on the first postoperative day. This patient needed two units of blood transfused following the second operation. There were no other complications. The two patients with splenectomy and resection of ⅔ of the spleen developed a transient thrombocytosis indicating impaired clearance of the spleen. In a follow-up involving ultrasonography (median 13, range 1-101 months) all patients managed with partially spleen-saving surgery showed a large remnant spleen with arterial perfusion. CONCLUSION: The majority of primarily partially spleen-preserving operations result from OIS grade IV ruptures of the spleen. Use of a partially spleen-saving surgical approach was successful in ¾ of these patients. Low morbidity and documented perfusion of the remnant spleen at long-term follow-up indicate that a spleen-preserving technique is warranted if an operative approach is required.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.002 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.002 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".