MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2410899179 · doi:10.1103/physrevb.94.205106

Superconducting quantum criticality of topological surface states at three loops

2016· article· en· W2410899179 on OpenAlexafffund
Nikolai Zerf, Chien‐Hung Lin, Joseph Maciejko

Bibliographic record

VenuePhysical review. B./Physical review. B · 2016
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldPhysics and Astronomy
TopicTopological Materials and Phenomena
Canadian institutionsCanadian Institute for Advanced ResearchUniversity of Alberta
FundersNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of CanadaCanada Research ChairsCanadian Institute for Advanced Research
KeywordsSupersymmetryPhysicsTopological insulatorTheoretical physicsFermionDirac fermionQuantum mechanicsParticle physicsTopology (electrical circuits)

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

First proposed in the context of elementary particle physics, supersymmetry is an exotic symmetry that relates bosons and fermions but has not yet been observed in nature. While the traditional expectation is that supersymmetry would be first observed in a high-energy physics experiment, an alternative possibility stressed recently is that supersymmetry could be realized as an emergent symmetry at long wavelengths and low energies in interacting many-particle systems. More specifically, it was suggested that supersymmetry emerges at the quantum phase transition between the gapless Dirac semimetal and a gapped superconductor on the surface of a 3D topological insulator. The authors of this paper provide additional support for the conjecture by performing a three-loop renormalization group calculation and showing that the supersymmetric fixed point in 2+1 dimensions remains stable to that order in perturbation theory.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Theoretical or conceptual · Consensus signal: Theoretical or conceptual
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.048
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0030.001
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0030.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.036
GPT teacher head0.374
Teacher spread0.338 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; both teacher heads agree on what is shown here.

Study designTheoretical or conceptual
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations63
Published2016
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venuePhysical review. B./Physical review. BSame topicTopological Materials and PhenomenaFrench-language works237,207