MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2410989741

[Extragastric growth type carcinoma of the stomach with cyst formation].

2012· article· en· W2410989741 on OpenAlexaff
Seiki Miura, Jun Kawamoto, Tadaomi Fukada

Bibliographic record

VenuePubMed · 2012
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicGastrointestinal Tumor Research and Treatment
Canadian institutionsCanadian Society of Intestinal Research
Fundersnot available
KeywordsCurvatures of the stomachMedicineTransverse colonStomachAntrumGastrectomyAdenocarcinomaCarcinomaRadiologyCystBiopsyMedullary cavityPyloric AntrumNuclear medicineCancerPathologySurgeryGastroenterologyInternal medicine
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

A 65-year-old man presented with epigastralgia in our department. Contrast-enhanced computed tomography scan showed a large cystic tumor of about 12 cm in diameter attached to the gastric antrum and transverse colon. Gastric endoscopy revealed type 2 advanced gastric cancer located at the greater curvature of the antrum, and the posterior wall of the stomach was pressed from the outside. The result of tumor biopsy was adenocarcinoma. Positron emission tomography -computed tomography showed a markedly increased uptake of fluorodeoxyglucose to the tumor. With a diagnosis of extragastric growth type carcinoma of the stomach with cystic change, a distal gastrectomy, D1+lymph node dissection, and partial resection of the transverse colon was performed. A histological examination of the specimen confirmed tub2- por1, medullary type, INF b, se, ly0, v1, n0 in stage IIb, and no infiltration to the transverse colon. His postoperative course was uneventful 12 months after operation.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Case report · Consensus signal: Case report
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.005
Threshold uncertainty score0.016

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0050.002

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.032
GPT teacher head0.231
Teacher spread0.199 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designCase report
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2012
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venuePubMedSame topicGastrointestinal Tumor Research and TreatmentFrench-language works237,207