Performance enhancement of multi‐hop relay‐based wireless systems based on outage probability
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Wireless communication is now accessible throughout the world, with an increasing number of users. Engineers are putting extra efforts to evaluate and improve the performance of wireless systems. Multi‐hop wireless systems have drawn significant attention as a cost‐effective solution to improve the performance of wireless systems. In these systems, a certain number of relays is deployed over the cell to help in the transmission of signals from the base station (BS) to the users. In a multi‐hop system, a low‐quality long‐distance link is broken into two or more better‐quality links, minimising the outage probability and enhancing the system performance. Interference is one of the fundamental elements affecting the quality of service in wireless networks. The probability density function (PDF) of the signal‐to‐interference ratio (SIR) is evaluated in a circular cell with uniformly distributed users around a BS located at the centre of the cell. Then, the PDF for outage probability is assessed, based on the evaluated SIR. After that, the minimum number of relays and their placement is found over the studied area, which can achieve the desirable performance of the wireless system. Finally, simulation is performed based on long‐term evolution parameters to validate the derived analytical solution.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.003 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".