MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2411053862 · doi:10.5539/jpl.v9n4p99

Abortion in the Views of Different Religions and Laws

2016· article· en· W2411053862 on OpenAlexvenueno aff
Abass Shafei Ardestani, Mahdi Khaghani Esfahani, Seyed Mohamamd Hussieni

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Politics and Law · 2016
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicAmerican Constitutional Law and Politics
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsAbortionDignityLawPunishment (psychology)IslamPolitical scienceVerdictSociologyPsychologyPregnancySocial psychologyPhilosophyBiologyTheology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

More than ever, abortion is paid attention today by public especially in cases that keeping on the pregnancy has problems for mother or there is a fault or keeping the dignity of mother and her family depending on abortion and realizing from its consequences. Therefore, it is too important to obtain abortion verdict. Basically, abortion in all steps of growth evolution from the conclusion of zygote to birth is a decisive prohibition in Islam. The present paper studies abortion and religious verdicts and its effects based on different motivations in the view of religion and law. Further, different forms of abortion and its punishment in Iranian criminal laws are clarified here. Finally, different forms of abortion and their reasons in the views of religion and law are discussed in the present study.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.003
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.006
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.007
Threshold uncertainty score0.020

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0030.006
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0040.013
Scholarly communication0.0050.003
Open science0.0000.002
Research integrity0.0020.003
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.026
GPT teacher head0.320
Teacher spread0.294 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2016
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of Politics and LawSame topicAmerican Constitutional Law and PoliticsFrench-language works237,207