MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2411071458

Palabra de abundancia: saberes indígenas que fortalecen diálogos interculturales de derechos humanos en la Amazonia colombiana

2015· article· en· W2411071458 on OpenAlexaff

Bibliographic record

VenueAmericanae (AECID Library) · 2015
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicComparative constitutional jurisprudence studies
Canadian institutionsUniversité de Montréal
Fundersnot available
KeywordsAmazon rainforestHumanitiesGeographyPhilosophyBiologyEcology
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Este artículo analiza el papel de los saberes indígenas de la Gente de Centro grupo indígena multiétnico de la Amazonia colombiana− en el Plan de salvaguarda étnico uitoto capítulo Leticia (PSE). Este es uno de los 34 planes que el Estado colombiano, obligado por la Corte Constitucional, ha formulado e implementado para proteger a los pueblos indígenas amenazados por el desplazamiento forzado. Con base en la investigación anticolonial y de la descolonización, y en la perspectiva subalterna de los derechos humanos, se analiza el PSE como un diálogo intercultural inequitativo en el que los pueblos indígenas son obligados a expresarse según los discursos de derechos del Estado y de la Corte. This paper analyzes the role played by the indigenous knowledges of the People of the Centre −a multiethnic indigenous group of Colombian Amazonia− in the Witoto Ethnic Safeguarding Plan of Leticia (PSE). This is one of the 34 Plans that the Colombian Constitutional Court compelled the State to create and implement to protect indigenous peoples threatened by internal forced displacement. Drawing on anticolonial and decolonizing research and on subaltern perspectives on human rights, the paper focuses on the PSE as an intercultural and unequal dialogue that forces indigenous people to express themselves in the State and Court’s discourses of rights. Este artigo analisa o papel do conhecimento indígena da Gente de Centro −grupo indígena multiétnico da Amazônia colombiana− no Projeto de salvaguarda étnico uitoto capítulo Leticia (PSE). Este é um dos 34 projetos que o Estado colombiano, obrigado pelo Tribunal Constitucional, tem formulado e implementado para proteger os povos indígenas ameaçados pelo deslocamento forçado. Com base na pesquisa anticolonial e da descolonização, e uma perspectiva subalterna dos direitos humanos, o PSE é analisado como um diálogo intercultural desigual em que os povos indígenas são forçados a expressar conforme os discursos de direitos do Estado e do Tribunal.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.003
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Qualitative · Consensus signal: Qualitative
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.192
Threshold uncertainty score0.381

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.003
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0020.002
Science and technology studies0.0060.007
Scholarly communication0.0060.003
Open science0.0010.004
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0050.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.026
GPT teacher head0.331
Teacher spread0.306 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designQualitative
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2015
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueAmericanae (AECID Library)Same topicComparative constitutional jurisprudence studiesFrench-language works237,207