Radical-induced dissociation leading to the loss of CO<sub>2</sub>from the oxazolone ring of [b<sub>5</sub>− H]˙<sup>+</sup>ions
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Macrocyclization is commonly observed in large bn(+) (n≥ 4) ions and as a consequence can lead to incorrect protein identification due to sequence scrambling. In this work, the analogous [b5- H]˙(+) radical cations derived from aliphatic hexapeptides (GA5˙(+)) also showed evidence of macrocyclization under CID conditions. However, the major fragmentation for [b5- H]˙(+) ions is the loss of CO2 and not CO loss, which is commonly observed in closed-shell bn(+) ions. Isotopic labeling using CD3 and (18)O revealed that more than one common structure underwent dissociations. Theoretical studies found that the loss of CO2 is radical-driven and is facilitated by the radical being located at the Cα atom immediately adjacent to the oxazolone ring. Comparable energy barriers against macrocyclization, hydrogen-atom transfer, and fragmentations are found by DFT calculations and the results are consistent with the experimental observations that a variety of dissociation products are observed in the CID spectra.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.003 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".