MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2411121696 · doi:10.1055/s-2003-818009

Anticomplement and Antioxidant Activities of New Acetylated Flavonoid Glycosides from<i>Centaurium spicatum</i>

2003· article· en· W2411121696 on OpenAlexfundno aff
Abdelaaty A. Shahat, Paul Cos, Nina Hermans, Sandra Apers, Tess De Bruyne, Luc Pieters, Dirk Vanden Berghe, Arnold Vlietinck

Bibliographic record

VenuePlanta Medica · 2003
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldBiochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology
TopicNatural product bioactivities and synthesis
Canadian institutionsnot available
FundersUniversity of British Columbia
KeywordsGlycosideQuercetinDEPTFlavonoidStereochemistryChemistryTraditional medicineAntioxidantBiochemistryMedicine

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

In addition to the three acetylated flavonol glycosides, quercetin 3- O-[(2,3,4-triacetyl-alpha-rhamnopyranosyl)-(1-->6)]-beta-galactopyranoside, quercetin 3- O-[(2,3,4-triacetyl-alpha-rhamnopyranosyl)-(1-->6)]-3-acetyl-beta-galactopyranoside, and quercetin 3- O-[(2,3,4- triacetyl-alpha-rhamnopyranosyl)-(1-->6)]-4-acetyl-beta-galactopyranoside, which have recently been isolated from Centaurium spicatum (L.) Fritsch (Gentianaceae), a new pentaacetylated flavonoid glycoside was isolated from the same plant. Structure elucidation, especially the localization of the acetyl groups, and complete (1)H- and (13)C-NMR assignments, was carried out using one- and two-dimensional NMR methods, including (1)H- and (13)C-NMR, DEPT-135 and DEPT-90, and gradient-assisted experiments such as DQF-COSY, TOCSY, HSQC and HMBC. The structure of the new flavonoid glycoside was established as quercetin 3- O-[(2,3,4-triacetyl-alpha-rhamnopyranosyl)-(1-->6)]-3,4-diacetyl-beta-galactopyranoside. The anticomplement and antioxidant activities of these compounds were evaluated. The triacetylated flavonoid glycoside showed the highest activity in the two assays.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.041
Threshold uncertainty score0.551

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.010
GPT teacher head0.227
Teacher spread0.217 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations20
Published2003
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venuePlanta MedicaSame topicNatural product bioactivities and synthesisFrench-language works237,207