MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2411346974

Genetic analysis indicates that transcription factors AP-2alpha and Pax6 cooperate in the normal patterning and morphogenesis of the lens.

2007· article· en· W2411346974 on OpenAlexaff
L. Makhani, Trevor Williams, Judith A. West‐Mays

Bibliographic record

VenuePubMed · 2007
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldBiochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology
TopicConnexins and lens biology
Canadian institutionsMcMaster University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsPAX6BiologyColocalizationHeterozygote advantageEye developmentCell biologyMolecular biologyGeneticsPhenotypeTranscription factorGeneAllele
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

PURPOSE: The similar lens phenotypes observed in mice with mutations in the genes encoding either Pax6 or AP-2alpha suggested that these transcription factors work together to regulate specific signaling cascades during lens development. In this study we examined the overlapping expression patterns of Pax6 and AP-2alpha in the developing mouse lens and further investigated their potential cooperative roles through the creation of double heterozygote mice. METHODS: Colocalization of Pax6 and AP-2alpha expression patterns were performed on sections of mouse embryos at embryonic days 9.5, 10.5, 13.5, and 16 as well as on adult sections using immunofluorescence. To test the potential cooperation between these two transcription factors, two mouse strains heterozygous for the genes encoding either Pax6 or AP-2alpha were bred together to produce double heterozygous Pax6(+/lacZ)/AP-2alpha(+/-) mice. Histological examination was then performed on both embryonic and post-natal sections in order to compare double heterozygous Pax6(+/lacZ)/AP-2alpha(+/-) eyes to single heterozygote and wildtype eyes. RESULTS: Examination of the developmental stages showed distinct colocalization of Pax6 and AP-2alpha protein in the anterior lens epithelium. However, Pax6 expression continued further into the transitional zone of the lens whereas AP-2alpha expression ceased just prior to the region where epithelial cells differentiate into fiber cells. Histological investigation of embryonic and post-natal mutant mouse eyes showed that while single Pax6 heterozygote mice exhibited remnants of a corneal-lenticular adhesion, the lens and cornea were physically separated. In contrast, the Pax6(+/lacZ)/AP-2alpha(+/-) double heterozygotes displayed a distinct lens stalk, which protruded towards the surface of the cornea, creating a direct corneal-lenticular attachment. CONCLUSIONS: Colocalization of Pax6 and AP-2alpha was mainly observed in the proliferating central lens epithelium, the same region in which the lens stalk phenotype was observed in the double heterozygous Pax6(+/lacZ)/AP-2alpha(+/-) eyes. The more severe phenotype observed in these double heterozygous mice, as compared to the single heterozygotes, suggests that Pax6 and AP-2alpha may work synergistically to control lens development.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.002
Threshold uncertainty score0.008

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.001
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.017
GPT teacher head0.200
Teacher spread0.183 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations15
Published2007
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venuePubMedSame topicConnexins and lens biologyFrench-language works237,207