Availability of urgent ultrasonography to emergency departments in New Zealand.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
AIM: To determine the availability and use of urgent ultrasonography to emergency departments in New Zealand. METHODS: A questionnaire used in Canada was modified for New Zealand and mailed to all emergency department clinical directors in New Zealand who are listed by the Australasian Society for Emergency Medicine. RESULTS: The response rate was 92% (24/26). Most clinical directors found it difficult to obtain an ultrasound scan during 'off-hours'. Only one emergency department had the facility to get an ultrasound scan within 15 minutes. Seventy nine per cent of clinical directors felt that emergency physicians should perform ultrasonography, yet only 29% were actually doing so. Of those not performing ultrasonography, 47% had plans to do so in the future. CONCLUSIONS: Most clinical directors feel that it is difficult to get an urgent ultrasound scan and that emergency physicians should be performing ultrasonography. With the proper training and support most clinical directors had plans to use ultrasonography in the future.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.002 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".