MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2412131698 · doi:10.1021/acschembio.5b00189

Protein Termini and Their Modifications Revealed by Positional Proteomics

2015· review· en· W2412131698 on OpenAlex
Giada Marino, Ulrich Eckhard, Christopher M. Overall

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.
fundA Canadian funder is recorded on the work.

Bibliographic record

VenueACS Chemical Biology · 2015
Typereview
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicPeptidase Inhibition and Analysis
Canadian institutionsUniversity of British Columbia
FundersMichael Smith Health Research BC
KeywordsProteomeProteomicsComputational biologyBiologyHuman proteome projectProteolysisBioinformaticsGeneticsBiochemistryGene

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

A myriad of co- and post-translational modifications occur at protein N- and C-termini, resulting in an extra layer of proteome complexity and an additional source of protein regulation. Here, we review N- and C-terminal modifications and the contemporary positional proteomics techniques used to isolate protein terminal peptides from complex protein mixtures and characterize their diversity and occurrence in biological systems. Furthermore, these degradomics strategies--often referred to as N- and C-terminomics--represent dedicated high-throughput techniques to study proteolysis in dynamic living systems. Over the past decade, terminomics studies have provided indispensable information on the functional states of individual proteins, cell types, tissues, and biological processes and delivered fundamental new data for the Human Proteome Project, including high confidence identifications of many so-called "missing proteins", which had not been identified by traditional proteomics analyses.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Review · Consensus signal: Review
Teacher disagreement score0.964
Threshold uncertainty score0.748

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0010.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.051
GPT teacher head0.344
Teacher spread0.294 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it